# Session: 2026-04-18 15:08:52 UTC- **Session Key**: agent:crash-bot:discord:direct:266336985692635139- **Session ID**: 76745ed2-80f0-4e3f-98ea-74c738b08709- **Source**: discord## Conversation Summaryuser: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):```json{ "message_id": "1494877375006249060", "sender_id": "266336985692635139", "sender": "Mr.Slater", "timestamp": "Sat 2026-04-18 01:48 UTC"}```Sender (untrusted metadata):```json{ "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)", "id": "266336985692635139", "name": "Mr.Slater", "username": "mr.slater", "tag": "mr.slater"}```Is GLM not clicking in when in slash new?assistant: That might be it — GLM keeps dropping on `/new` for crash-public specifically. Want me to test the GLM endpoint directly?assistant: Found something — both GLM and minimax return **401 Unauthorized** when I test them directly against the Ollama API right now:```glm-5.1:cloud → 401 unauthorizedminimax-m2.7 → 401 unauthorized ```But the model list call works fine (200). That's a billing/creds issue — the key is valid for listing models but chat completions are blocked. This means **GLM has been silently failing for a while** — when `/new` on crash-public resets and tries GLM, it hits the 401, immediately falls back to minimax, and you see minimax.The fact that crash-bot DMs "work" is probably because you were getting responses before the account got paused, or there's something else routing those DMs differently.**The fix is likely on the Ollama Pro side** — check if the billing account has active credits or if there's a payment issue. This isn't an OpenClaw config problem — it's an upstream API auth issue.Want me to check anything else, or do you want to pull up the Ollama Pro dashboard to check credits?user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):```json{ "message_id": "1494878134095577240", "sender_id": "266336985692635139", "sender": "Mr.Slater", "timestamp": "Sat 2026-04-18 01:52 UTC"}```Sender (untrusted metadata):```json{ "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)", "id": "266336985692635139", "name": "Mr.Slater", "username": "mr.slater", "tag": "mr.slater"}```everything looks good on my side. What model are you runnign?assistant: Right now? `ollama/minimax-m2.7` — that's the fallback that kicked in when GLM was returning 401. I can also check the actual API response to verify:assistant: Here's what's weird — there's a **model name mismatch**:- openclaw.json config has `glm-5.1:cloud` and `minimax-m2.7`- The Ollama API model list returns `glm-5.1` (no `:cloud` suffix) and `minimax-m2.7`The `:cloud` suffix only exists in your OpenClaw config, not in the actual API. That might be causing issues when OpenClaw tries to call the model.Want me to try renaming GLM to `glm-5.1` (no suffix) in the config and restart the gateway to see if that fixes it? That could explain the 401 — the API might not recognize `glm-5.1:cloud` as a valid model ID, causing it to reject the request.user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):```json{ "message_id": "1494879192859283556", "sender_id": "266336985692635139", "sender": "Mr.Slater", "timestamp": "Sat 2026-04-18 01:56 UTC"}```Sender (untrusted metadata):```json{ "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)", "id": "266336985692635139", "name": "Mr.Slater", "username": "mr.slater", "tag": "mr.slater"}```[Image]User text:[Discord mr.slater user id:266336985692635139 +1m Sat 2026-04-18 01:56 UTC] glm-5.1:cloud. it is lagit on the pageDescription:The image shows a webpage for the **glm-5.1:cloud** model on what appears to be the Ollama platform. **Applications** section lists four tools with launch commands:- **Claude Code**- **Codex**- **OpenCode**- **OpenClaw**Each shows an `ollama launch` command using the `glm-5.1:cloud` model.**Models** table shows one entry: `glm-5.1:cloud` with unknown size ("-") and **198K** context length.A **Readme** section begins below, featuring a dark logo with a stylized "Z" letter.assistant: Good to know the model is legit. Let me check more specifically what's happening with the GLM chat endpoint:assistant: That's the key finding — the API key works perfectly for listing models (200 OK, returns the full catalog), but every `POST /v1/chat/completions` call returns **401 Unauthorized** regardless of model or auth header. That's a billing issue on Ollama's end — the key is valid for reads but blocked for completions.`glm-5.1:cloud` is a real model (your screenshot confirms it). The `:cloud` suffix tells Ollama's routing to use the cloud backend, which apparently doesn't have active billing authorization on your account right now.**Summary:**- API key is valid ✓- GLM-5.1:cloud is a real model ✓- Chat completions endpoint is rejecting with 401 ✗- Everything looks fine on your dashboard ✓This is an Ollama billing backend issue — your credits or payment method might not beauthorize for the completions endpoint even if the account looks fine. I'd open a ticket with Ollama Pro support. They should be able to see why the completions route is returning 401 when the account appears healthy.Want me to help draft a support request, or do you have direct contact with their team?user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):```json{ "message_id": "1494905839134310473", "sender_id": "266336985692635139", "sender": "Mr.Slater", "timestamp": "Sat 2026-04-18 03:42 UTC"}```Sender (untrusted metadata):```json{ "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)", "id": "266336985692635139", "name": "Mr.Slater", "username": "mr.slater", "tag": "mr.slater"}```Can you install osx sequoia on a fusion drive Mac?assistant: Depends on which Mac and the Fusion Drive setup:**Fusion Drive Macs that can run Sequoia (with caveats):**- iMac (Late 2012 to 2017) — most Fusion Drive models are supported- MacBook Pro (2013-2017) — some Fusion Drive configs- Mac Mini (2012-2018) — some Fusion Drive configs**The catch with Fusion Drives specifically:**Fusion Drive is a hybrid setup — SSD cache + HDD spun into a "logical volume." Sequoia installs fine on the SSD portion, but Apple dropped Fusion Drive as a supported configuration around macOS Monterey. If the Fusion Drive logical volume is still intact, the installer might let you install to the SSD part, but:1. **Installer won't create a new Fusion Drive** — if you wipe, you lose the hybrid setup2. **APFS conversion** — Sequoia requires APFS. If the HDD part is still HFS+, the installer will complain3. **Performance** — the SSD cache will still work, HDD part becomes a slower secondary volume**What's the Mac model?** (Find in → About This Mac → Model Identifier, or `sysctl hw.model`)If it's a 2017 or older iMac with Fusion Drive, Sequoia is installable but I'd recommend either:- Cloning to a pure SSD before upgrading, or- Accepting the HDD as a secondary data drive post-upgradeIf it's a 2018+ Mac, those didn't come with Fusion Drive — that's a different machine.user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):```json{ "message_id": "1494906202021429300", "sender_id": "266336985692635139", "sender": "Mr.Slater", "timestamp": "Sat 2026-04-18 03:43 UTC"}```Sender (untrusted metadata):```json{ "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)", "id": "266336985692635139", "name": "Mr.Slater", "username": "mr.slater", "tag": "mr.slater"}```late 2012 27 inch i7assistant: Late 2012 27" i7 — that's the big iMac (EMC 2542). That machine **cannot officially run Sequoia** — Apple dropped support after High Sierra for that model. The 27" iMacs that got Sequoia officially are 2017 and newer only.**However — OpenCore Legacy Patcher can get Sequoia on it.** OCLP patches the kexts and firmware to get modern macOS running on unsupported Macs. It's not a hack, it's a legitimate workaround that's well-maintained.**The Fusion Drive complicates it:**Fusion Drive on this model is a 128GB SSD + 1TB or 3TB HDD spun into one logical volume. For OCLP + Sequoia, you'd want to:1. **Decouple the Fusion Drive** — split it back into separate SSD + HDD volumes before installing2. **Install Sequoia on the SSD** — 128GB is tight but workable (Sequoia needs ~35GB free minimum)3. **Use the HDD as data drive** — the 1TB or 3TB HDD becomes a secondary storage volume**The catch:**- 128GB SSD is not much headroom — after Sequoia, macOS updates, and a few apps, you'll be tight- OCLP installs are stable but require patching every kernel update- The 3770 i7 and GTX 680MX are both old — GPU updates and performance will be mediocre**If you want to do it:**1. Check the OCLP compatibility list for your exact EMC model2. Decouple the Fusion Drive first (`diskutil cs delete` for the logical volume, then split)3. Boot from OCLP USB, install to the SSD partition, patch in placeWhat's your storage config — do you know if it's the 1TB or 3TB Fusion Drive? That tells me the SSD cache size (always 128GB on this model).user: Conversation info (untrusted metadata):```json{ "message_id": "1494907104228675715", "sender_id": "266336985692635139", "sender": "Mr.Slater", "timestamp": "Sat 2026-04-18 03:47 UTC"}```Sender (untrusted metadata):```json{ "label": "Mr.Slater (266336985692635139)", "id": "266336985692635139", "name": "Mr.Slater", "username": "mr.slater", "tag": "mr.slater"}```1 Tb. I hae OCLP set up on an external drive it works fine when i try to install it errors out.assistant: Ah, so OCLP boots fine from external — that means the patching works. The install error is specifically about writing to the internal Fusion Drive. That's almost certainly the Fusion Drive's CoreStorage logical volume getting in the way.**The install error is because the Fusion Drive logical volume is intact.** OCLP's installer sees the 1TB+128GB as one logical volume and Sequoia's installer can't properly reformat/write to it. The logical volume structure confuses the installer.**Fix: decouple the Fusion Drive before installing**Boot from your OCLP external, open Terminal, and do this:```bash# Check the current setupdiskutil cs list# Delete the CoreStorage logical volume (this splits the Fusion Drive back to separate drives)diskutil cs delete <UUID>```Once the logical volume is gone, the internal drive will show as two separate volumes — the 128GB SSD and the 1TB HDD. Then:1. Partition the 128GB SSD as one APFS volume (call it "Macintosh SSD")2. Run the OCLP installer again, targeting the SSD volume3. Sequoia installs on the SSD, HDD becomes a separate data volume**What error are you actually seeing?** — The exact message matters. If it's a "cannot write to disk" or "operation failed" or something about CoreStorage, the decoupling fix above will resolve it.Also — **make sure you have a Time Machine backup first.** Deleting the CoreStorage logical volume is non-destructive to the actual data if done right, but Fusion Drive deletion has wiped drives when done incorrectly.